Skip to main content
WIP: Testing n8n automations
Automation that links the latest forum posts

Latest Forum Topics

Livepeer Forum

It's time to ACT! Accumulation & the Treasury Ceiling

By b3nnn (@b3nnn)
Dec 3, 2025

The onchain treasury was designed to provide sustainable public goods funding. It has supported many important and strategic contributions to the Livepeer Ecosystem. The AI SPE, Streamplace, Agent SPE and Cloud have all received funds and made important contributions. And through our onchain governance, the community have shown time and again their thoughtfulness and care for getting decisions right. Your desire to align decisions with long-term health has made us a shining example of simple but effective governance and how people can working together onchain.

The treasury is key to supporting strategic investments to improve UX for stakeholders, effectively manage protocol security, and fund other capital and resource needs for this exciting phase of the project.

As of now, the onchain treasury is currently not accumulating LPT. It was designed not to accept unlimited funding, hit the initial value set as the ceiling, and reset treasury contributions to 0% on or around 31st of March this year. There are a backlog of upcoming projects on highly strategic initiatives that will need treasury support, and we will all feel better about how to allocate funds if we have certainty that new funds are coming into the treasury.

I intend to post a LIP to turn on the treasury rewards again at their initial values:

  • treasuryRewardCutRate: 10%

  • treasuryBalanceCeiling: 750000 LPT

The rate of 750000 LPT is currently set as the ceiling so would not be updated in the formal proposal

For what it’s worth, my personal bias is to increase one of these values, but I’m happy to punt that discussion to another day. Having seen the exciting things in the background that will require treasury support in coming weeks, the most pressing item for us as a community is to start getting the treasury repopulated.

I’ll be on the watercooler next week to discuss and am happy to set up an office hours to discuss direct if there is support for that. I look forward to proposing this for a community vote . If you have any input on the contribution percentage that goes into my proposal, please also share your input here.

Scroll for more ↓

Pre-proposal: IDOL - Improving Dex / Onchain Liquidity

By b3nnn (@b3nnn)
Dec 1, 2025
TLDR

We propose to address known UX issues and ease and costs to participate by increasing DEX liquidity. Arrakis offers an optimal solution for our specific needs, and we are requesting 250,000 LPT for deployment to a Uniswap v4 pool which will significantly reduce slippage for ecosystem participants

Motivation

The Capital Markets Advisory board made improving onchain liquidity a tactical recommendation, specifically sighting:

  • Low liquidity levels on our DEX pools (primarily Uniswap on Arbitrum). This creates high slippage when trying to transact with any size, and might refrain larger stakeholders or participants from buying LPT

  • The much higher ratio of available liquidity on centralized exchanges compared to DEXs drives participants to rely on centralized platforms, exposing them to the inherent risks associated with centralized providers

  • Further, centralised exchanges often don’t support L2 withdrawals. This results in delayed bridging and withdrawal processing between L1 & L2, impairing overall UX and the efficiency of orchestrators as it relates to capital allocation

In short, improved L2 Dex liquidity is essential for both current and future participants in Livepeer.

Recommended Solution

How to address our challenges is relatively straightforward to describe:

  • Increase the amount of liquidity on targeted DEX pool/s

  • Ensure the solution is executing against this goal as agreed

  • Use funds wisely, ensuring a good balance between what we pay and what we receive

Any solution will require liquidity from the on-chain treasury to start bootstrapping an optimal asset mix. In addition to this liquidity requirement, using a traditional market maker is likely a major expense (in the range of $15-20K per month). While traditional market makers can do a good job in actively managing liquidity, especially on centralised exchanges, they often present new or additional challenges:

  • Market makers typically operate through asset loan agreements, using our capital to actively manage liquidity across venues. While this model provides flexibility and professional management, it can make visibility into how and where assets are deployed more challenging.

  • Compared to centralized venues, on-chain liquidity provision is often less economically attractive for market makers. As a result, they may prioritize other strategies or venues where returns are higher, which can limit incentives to deepen on-chain liquidity.

  • Ensuring that capital is being used effectively by traditional market makers remains challenging, as it requires clear visibility into capital deployment and a deep understanding of the alternative strategies they pursue.

While none of this is insurmountable, it requires significant thought, effort and time to ensure oversight and manage risk.

Arrakis pro is an ideal solution to addresses these challenges.

Arrakis specifically addresses each of these challenges because:

  • It is built specifically for managing onchain liquidity on DEXs

  • The assets are stored in a vault controlled by a multisig made up of Livpeer Foundation members. This means the treasury, via the Foundation, can withdraw and return the liquidity at any time

  • Because it is onchain, and through the features provided in Arrakis pro, we can check and confirm at any time where our assets are and what strategies are being applied.

  • It rebalances positions by setting up ranges / limit orders, no swaps involved. The solution algorithmically minimises price impact given the allocated capital and bootstraps base asset liquidity without causing negative selling pressure.

  • Arrakis leverages sophisticated algorithms to increase capital efficiency for the deployed capital and reduce slippage for traders on the DEX pools.

Arrakis vaults hold ~$170M TVL and the team actively manages the on-chain liquidity for over 100 protocols. Projects such as MakerDAO, Lido, Morpho, Gelato, Redstone, Wormhole, Across, Euler, Usual, Syrup, Venice.ai, Ether.fi, etc. are benefiting from the high capital efficiency and cost effectiveness for DEX liquidity optimization enabled by Arrakis PRO.

For more information regarding Arrakis and Arrakis Pro, feel free to have a look at their docs or join their community:

Arrakis | Twitter | Resources

In addition, the team are present here and will address any questions directly - hello @Arrakis

The Ask

We want to significantly decrease slippage and costs for orchestrators and other participants to interact with the network through onchain liquidity.

We are asking for 250,000 LPT (approx. $1M in USD value) to be held in a multisig controlled by the Livepeer Foundation, to be deployed via an onchain vault with Arrakis as a concentrated pool on Uniswap v4.

Management of concentrated liquidity on Uniswap V4 allows for larger trades with minimal price impact, improving the overall trading experience. Savings to participants are substantial at approx. $1500 in slippage reduction on a $25,000 sale of LPT (estimate based on data below).

Comparison of current and estimated price impact (after successful ETH liquidity bootstrapping) for buying LPT and ETH across different amounts

Specification for Livepeer
  1. The Arrakis team uses the existing LPT/ETH pool on the 0.3% fee tier for UniswapV4

  2. Arrakis then deploys a dedicated vault managed by the Arrakis Pro smart contract for this LPT/ETH Uniswap pool.

  3. The Livepeer Foundation team establish a ⅔ Multisig for custody of the funds. If the proposal passes, funds are transferred onchain to this multisig account

  4. Through this Livepeer Foundation multisig, we deposit $1 million worth of $LPT into the Arrakis Pro vault. Transfers in and out of the vault are controlled by the multisig, meaning they cannot be deployed or moved by Arrakis elsewhere

  5. Arrakis Pro will allocate the provided liquidity in a concentrated and fully active market making strategy to facilitate trading on UniswapV4.

  6. The strategy initially operates to bootstrap ETH to establish a 50/50 inventory ratio over the first months. The primary objective is to create price stability by generating deep liquidity and reaching an even inventory over time.

For the services provided, Arrakis charges the following fees:

Arrakis Asset-under-Management (AUM) fee: 1% per year, waived for the first 6 months

Arrakis performance fee: 50% of trading fees the vault generates

FAQ

What are the risks of this model?

  • Deploying funds to DEX pools bears smart contract risk and general market risk (e.g. token exposure, impermanent loss). Arrakis smart contracts have been audited by leading security firms and currently secure +$150M TVL (https://docs.arrakis.finance/text/resources/audits.html)

What happens to the capital required?

  • The capital required is deployed by the Livepeer DAO, via a Foundation controlled multisig, to a self-custodial smart contract vault and can be withdrawn at any point in time. Arrakis does not hold custody, nor control the funds deployed outside of the mandate to manage DEX liquidity on Uniswap V4 for the respective trading pair.

Will this impact the current liquidity on CEXs?

  • Arrakis mandate is to gradually improve on-chain markets and provide deeper liquidity for the respective pair over time on DEX markets. CEX markets will not be affected.

How does the Arrakis model differ from standard AMMs (like Uniswap v3)?

  • Arrakis provides a sophisticated on-chain market making service, running dedicated algorithmic market making strategies.

  • Instead of manually deploying funds into the CLAMM pool, Arrakis algorithmically rebalances the position and runs active liquidity management strategies.

Will our liquidity still be actively managed, or will it be passively allocated in a vault?

  • Close to 100% of the liquidity deployed with an Arrakis vault is actively deployed to the Uniswap CLAMM pool and provides liquidity. Small shares of liquidity remain in the vault as token reserves for rebalancing purposes.

How is the strategy for the vault determined — who sets the parameters, and how often are they rebalanced?

  • Arrakis quant team fine tunes the strategies and engages in period review cycles along with 24h-365day monitoring and alerting.

Who controls or can modify the AMM strategy parameters?

  • Arrakis strategies are designed, deployed and maintained by professional quant traders. The Foundation can be involved in discussion in regular intervals as needed to further align on achieving the stated goals.

Will the community have visibility into performance and strategy updates?

  • The Foundation delegates will receive access to a custom real time analytics dashboard and can share periodic updates to the forum for the community.

What happens to the liquidity if the vault underperforms or becomes unbalanced?

  • Liquidity is actively rebalanced towards a 50:50 ratio by placing one sided limit maker orders. In adverse market scenarios strategies will adjust to certain market volatility settings.

How do fees compare to centralized market makers?

  • Centralized market makers work in two models: a) Loan & Option b) Retainer Fix Fee payment. Arrakis works on a profit sharing of trading fees earned (50% captured by the Livepeer DAO, 50% retained by Arrakis for the services provided)

How will LP performance be measured?

  • LP performance will be measured by market depth, price impact, slippage improvement, total volumes facilitated.

What happens after funds are returned?

  • It’s important to note that the liquidity in the vault can remain deployed indefinitely, but also returned to the onchain treasury or control by the voters at any time. As funds will now be held in both ETH and LPT, the community can be involved in discussions about how returned funds are stored or used.

This is a large proportion of the current treasury. What gives?

  • We recognise that this is a large ask relative to the current size and value of the treasury. The size and value of the treasury will be addressed in a separate proposal. As it relates to this proposal, consider that we will reduce slippage costs by approx 2-3X on every dex transaction. The ROI on this proposal will be quite substantial.
Scroll for more ↓

Transformation SPE Release Notes

By Mehrdad (@Mehrdad)
Nov 10, 2025

Release notes are a way to share work being completed by the Transformation SPE and it’s various contributors. Dive in and explore what has been happening and please reach out or reply with any questions and we will happily expand further.

Transcoder Campaign: organic-node.eth

By Ron (@ron)
Dec 6, 2022

Hello fellow video enthusiast and web3 supporters,

Thanks for your time in reading my post. (organic-node.eth) Node has been active for about 6 months and everyday has been a great learning experience. My node has been highly reliable with 4 Orchestrators across the globe with possibility to expand more depending on the demand. If you are looking to get in touch with me please reach out to me on discord Organic-Node#9009.

It gives me great pleasure when looking at lenstube videos, thinking that some of these vides may have been transcoded by my Orch. Stakes and delegators enjoy passive income with my low reward cuts and low fee cut and help support robust Orch for a fairer web3 platforms

Stake here:
(organic-node.eth)

Scroll for more ↓